Setlivapolicy 2026.3Demonstration tenant
← Back to queue
RCV-8815ReceivableINNet 45via whatsapp

Bhattacharya Textiles Pvt Ltd

Textiles · INV-2026-04208

At stake
₹4,90,000.00
Expected recovery under this decision ₹3,82,200.00
Ageing
38 days past due
Fell due 25 July 2026
Engine decision
Hold and waitHigh confidence
Decided by gate G-PROMISE-OPEN, bypassing the score of 11.
The engine’s working

Streamed as it happens. Real timings are scaled down so the run is watchable.

·Idle. The decision below is already computed; running replays how it was reached.
Step 1 — the facts it extracted7 signals from 7 records
Against it
  • An unexpired promise to pay is on filePROMISE_OPEN

    ₹4,90,000.00 is promised for 12 September 2026, and that date has not yet passed.

    An unexpired promise to pay suppresses further pressure · traced to EV-8815-06

    -25
  • Every promise keptPROMISES_ALWAYS_KEPTcited

    All 4 promises to pay recorded on this account were kept.

    Promise-keeping record (corroborating promises evidence, discounted to 40%) · traced to EV-8815-06

    -4.8
  • Part payment receivedPART_PAYMENT_RECEIVED

    ₹3,50,000.00 was received by UPI on 6 August 2026 under reference bhatt@okicici, leaving ₹4,90,000.00 outstanding.

    Part payment received against the balance · traced to EV-8815-02

    -10
  • Relationship guard appliesRELATIONSHIP_GUARD

    Lifetime value of ₹92,00,000.00 across 29 months exceeds your ₹43,70,000.00 guard, and 4 orders are currently open.

    Lifetime value guard · traced to EV-8815-07

    -8
Context
  • Past duePAST_DUE

    Invoice INV-2026-04208 for ₹4,90,000.00 fell due on 25 July 2026, 38 days ago.

    Invoice ageing: 31-60 days · traced to EV-8815-01

    +16
  • Propensity to settle unaidedPROPENSITYcited

    Payment behaviour scores 78 of 100 on 4 settled invoices, with a median pay lag of 23 days after terms and a spread of 3 days.

    Propensity to settle unaided, inverted into intervention pressure · traced to EV-8815-03

    -14
  • Contact headroom remainsCONTACT_HEADROOM

    2 of the permitted 7 contact attempts in the trailing seven days have been used.

    Contact frequency governance · traced to EV-8815-05

    +0
Step 2 — hard gatesThese bypass the score entirely
  • Unexpired promise to payG-PROMISE-OPENdecided this case

    A promise to pay is on file and its date has not passed. Chasing inside a live promise teaches the debtor that promises are not respected, which is precisely the behaviour that makes the next one worthless.

Step 3the position it takesnone

No action — INV-2026-04208

Why nothing is being sent

A promise to pay is on file and its date has not passed. Chasing inside a live promise teaches the debtor that promises are not respected, which is precisely the behaviour that makes the next one worthless.

PROPENSITYPROMISES_ALWAYS_KEPT

Exhibits attached
  1. EV-8815-02Part payment received · ICICI UPI-442190883311
  2. EV-8815-06Promises to pay · Setliva ptp_BT-6620
  3. EV-8815-07Account profile · Salesforce acct_BT-6620

Step 4 — self-checkReleased

Every assertion in this artifact resolves to a record on the case. Nothing withheld.

digest a018d10d5fc80d3a · the same case always produces this digest

The record7 items
  • InvoiceEV-8815-01
    Tally · INV-2026-04208 · captured 10 Jun 2026
    amount_minor
    84000000
    currency
    INR
    terms
    Net 45
    po_reference
    PO-55021
  • Part payment receivedEV-8815-02
    ICICI · UPI-442190883311 · captured 06 Aug 2026
    amount_minor
    35000000
    currency
    INR
    rail
    UPI
    reference
    bhatt@okicici
  • Payment history, 24 monthsEV-8815-03
    Tally · cust_BT-6620 · captured 01 Sept 2026
    rows
    2026-05-25|2026-06-18|72000000;2026-04-25|2026-05-16|68000000;2026-03-…
    invoices_paid
    17
    invoices_written_off
    0
    partial_payments
    9
  • Channel consentEV-8815-04
    Setliva · consent_BT-6620 · captured 08 Apr 2025
    whatsapp
    true
    voice
    true
    sms
    true
    method
    signed_supply_agreement
  • Contact attempts, trailing 7 daysEV-8815-05
    Setliva · log_BT-6620 · captured 01 Sept 2026
    attempts_last_7_days
    2
    last_contact_at
    2026-08-29T12:15:00Z
    last_channel
    whatsapp
    responded
    true
  • Promises to payEV-8815-06
    Setliva · ptp_BT-6620 · captured 29 Aug 2026
    promises_made
    4
    promises_kept
    4
    promises_broken
    0
    last_promise_at
    2026-08-29T12:15:00Z
    last_promise_amount_minor
    49000000
    + 2 more fields
  • Account profileEV-8815-07
    Salesforce · acct_BT-6620 · captured 01 Sept 2026
    lifetime_value_minor
    920000000
    relationship_months
    29
    open_orders
    4
    timezone
    Asia/Kolkata
Propensity to settle unaided78/100
Base rate
Starting position before any account evidence.
+50
Median pay lag
Settles a median 23 days after terms.
+4
Consistency
Pay timing varies by only 3 days across invoices.
+10
Promise keeping
4 of 4 promises to pay were kept.
+10
Responsiveness
The most recent contact attempt was answered.
+8
Part-payment pattern
Settles in instalments more often than in full — expect a plan, not a payment.
-4

Days-past-due is deliberately not an input. Lateness is a property of the invoice; this is a property of the payer.

Your decision
Your verdict on the engine’s decision
Audit trail2 events
  • case.evaluated08:49:30
    7 signals extracted; digest a018d10d5fc80d3a
    23c5f0ecdd0f744d3eee6960
  • decision.gated08:49:31
    G-PROMISE-OPEN fired, giving await
    cc8ee1765fef40d02b7af834