Where this is weakest.
The cases worth a reviewer’s time are the ones the engine is least sure about, not the ones it handled cleanly. This view sorts for that.
Gated decisions report high confidence because a gate is categorical, not a judgement about the balance of evidence.
No dispute currently sits within 8 points of the evidence floor. When one does it appears here first, because a small change in a single exhibit flips the outcome.
Nothing is currently blocked or flagged.
Every citation in every artifact resolves to a signal, every signal to a record on its case, and every monetary figure to a cited signal or the case itself. That is the condition for release, checked on each run rather than assumed.
These are not untraced assertions. Each is either an absence — no proof of delivery exists, no 3-D Secure result was held — or a policy threshold restated against the case. They are listed because an absence is exactly the kind of claim that deserves a reader, and because a signal that ought to have a record and does not would show up here.
No reviews recorded yet.
Open any case and record a verdict — approve, override or return — and it appears here and in the audit chain alongside the engine’s own reasoning.